Microsatellite instability and mismatch repair protein deficiency: equal predictive markers?

Current clinical guidelines recommend mismatch repair (MMR) protein immunohistochemistry (IHC) or molecular microsatellite instability (MSI) tests as predictive markers of immunotherapies. Most of the pathological guidelines consider MMR protein IHC as the gold standard test to identify cancers with MMR deficiency and recommend molecular MSI tests only in special circumstances or to screen for Lynch syndrome. However, there are data in the literature which suggest that the two test types may not be equal. For example, molecular epidemiology studies reported different rates of deficient MMR (dMMR) and MSI in various cancer types. Additionally, direct comparisons of the two tests revealed relatively frequent discrepancies between MMR IHC and MSI tests, especially in non-colorectal and non-endometrial cancers and in cases with unusual dMMR phenotypes. There are also scattered clinical data showing that the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors is different if the patient selection was based on dMMR versus MSI status of the cancers. All these observations question the current dogma that dMMR phenotype and genetic MSI status are equal predictive markers of the immunotherapies.

Gluing GAP to RAS Mutants: A New Approach to an Old Problem in Cancer Drug Development.

Mutated genes may lead to cancer development in numerous tissues. While more than 600 cancer-causing genes are known today, some of the most widespread mutations are connected to the RAS gene; RAS mutations are found in approximately 25% of all human tumors. Specifically, KRAS mutations are involved in the three most lethal cancers in the U.S., namely pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, colorectal adenocarcinoma, and lung adenocarcinoma. These cancers are among the most difficult to treat, and they are frequently excluded from chemotherapeutic attacks as hopeless cases. The mutated KRAS proteins have specific three-dimensional conformations, which perturb functional interaction with the GAP protein on the GAP-RAS complex surface, leading to a signaling cascade and uncontrolled cell growth. Here, we describe a gluing docking method for finding small molecules that bind to both the GAP and the mutated KRAS molecules. These small molecules glue together the GAP and the mutated KRAS molecules and may serve as new cancer drugs for the most lethal, most difficult-to-treat, carcinomas. As a proof of concept, we identify two new, drug-like small molecules with the new method; these compounds specifically inhibit the growth of the PANC-1 cell line with KRAS mutation G12D in vitro and in vivo. Importantly, the two new compounds show significantly lower IC50 and higher specificity against the G12D KRAS mutant human pancreatic cancer cell line PANC-1, as compared to the recently described selective G12D KRAS inhibitor MRTX-1133.

Comparison of standard mismatch repair deficiency and microsatellite instability tests in a large cancer series.

BACKGROUND: The tumor-agnostic indication of immune checkpoint inhibitors to treat cancers with mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR)/microsatellite instability (MSI) increased the demand for such tests beyond Lynch syndrome. International guideline recommendations accept immunohistochemistry (IHC) for dMMR or molecular techniques (PCR or NGS) for MSI status determinations considering the two tests are equal, although there are scattered reports contradicting to this presumption. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Here we have directly compared four protein MMR immunohistochemistry (IHC) to MSI Pentaplex PCR test in a large cancer patient cohort (n = 1306) of our diagnostic center where the two tests have been run parallel in 703 cases. RESULTS: In this study we have found a high discrepancy rate (19.3%) of the two tests which was independent of the tumor types. The MSI PCR sensitivity for MMR IHC status was found to be very low resulting in a relatively low positive and negative predicting values. As a consequence, the correlation of the two tests was low (kappa < 0.7). During analysis of the possible contributing factors of this poor performance, we have excluded low tumor percentage of the samples, but identified dMMR phenotypes (classic versus non-classic or unusual) as possible contributors. CONCLUSION: Although our cohort did not include samples with identified technical errors, our data strongly support previous reports that unidentified preanalytical factors might have the major influence on the poor performance of the MSI PCR and MMR IHC. Furthermore, the case is open whether the two test types are equally powerful predictive markers of immunotherapies.

Farnesyl-transferase inhibitors show synergistic anticancer effects in combination with novel KRAS-G12C inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Inhibition of mutant KRAS challenged cancer research for decades. Recently, allele-specific inhibitors were approved for the treatment of KRAS-G12C mutant lung cancer. However, de novo and acquired resistance limit their efficacy and several combinations are in clinical development. Our study shows the potential of combining G12C inhibitors with farnesyl-transferase inhibitors. METHODS: Combinations of clinically approved farnesyl-transferase inhibitors and KRAS G12C inhibitors are tested on human lung, colorectal and pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells in vitro in 2D, 3D and subcutaneous xenograft models of lung adenocarcinoma. Treatment effects on migration, proliferation, apoptosis, farnesylation and RAS signaling were measured by histopathological analyses, videomicroscopy, cell cycle analyses, immunoblot, immunofluorescence and RAS pulldown. RESULTS: Combination of tipifarnib with sotorasib shows synergistic inhibitory effects on lung adenocarcinoma cells in vitro in 2D and 3D. Mechanistically, we present antiproliferative effect of the combination and interference with compensatory HRAS activation and RHEB and lamin farnesylation. Enhanced efficacy of sotorasib in combination with tipifarnib is recapitulated in the subcutaneous xenograft model of lung adenocarcinoma. Finally, combination of additional KRAS G1C and farnesyl-transferase inhibitors also shows synergism in lung, colorectal and pancreatic adenocarcinoma cellular models. DISCUSSION: Our findings warrant the clinical exploration of KRAS-G12C inhibitors in combination with farnesyl-transferase inhibitors.

[Molecular epidemiology of microsatellite instability/mismatch repair deficiency in our institute - methodical aspects]. / A mikroszatellita-instabilitás/mismatch repair deficiencia genetikai hibák molekuláris epidemiológiája intézetünkben: módszertani megfontolások.

Molecular epidemiology of mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR)/microsatellite instability (MSI) are different in various ethnic groups; accordingly, our aim was to test this in a large single-center Hungarian cancer patient cohort. We have found that dMMR/MSI incidence correlates well with TCGA data in case of colorectal, gastric and endometrial cancers. We have also observed that immunohistochemistry- based dMMR incidences are higher as compared to MSI. We suggest that the testing guidelines must be fine-tuned for immune-oncology indications. Nádorvári ML, Kiss A, Barbai T, Rásó E, Tímár J. Molecular epidemiology of mismatch repair deficiency, microsatellite instability in a large single diagnostic center cancer cohort.

The Driverless Triple-Wild-Type (BRAF, RAS, KIT) Cutaneous Melanoma: Whole Genome Sequencing Discoveries.

The genetic makeup of the triple-wild-type melanoma (BRAF, NRAS and NF1) has been known for some time, but those studies grouped together rare histopathological versions with common ones, as well as mucosal and even uveal ones. Here we used whole genome sequencing to genetically characterize the triple-wild-type melanoma (TWM), termed here as BRAF, RAS and KIT wild type (the most frequent oncogenic drivers of skin melanoma), using the most common histological forms and excluding rare ones. All these tumors except one were clearly induced by UV based on the mutational signature. The tumor mutational burden was low in TWM, except in the NF1 mutant forms, and a relatively high frequency of elevated LOH scores suggested frequent homologue recombination deficiency, but this was only confirmed by the mutation signature in one case. Furthermore, all these TWMs were microsatellite-stabile. In this driverless setting, we revealed rare oncogenic drivers known from melanoma or other cancer types and identified rare actionable tyrosine kinase mutations in NTRK1, RET and VEGFR1. Mutations of TWM identified genes involved in antitumor immunity (negative and positive predictors of immunotherapy), Ca++ and BMP signaling. The two regressed melanomas of this cohort shared a 17-gene mutation signature, containing genes involved in antitumor immunity and several cell surface receptors. Even with this comprehensive genomic approach, a few cases remained driverless, suggesting that unrecognized drivers are hiding among passenger mutations.

Metastatic Progression of Human Melanoma.

This Topical Collection, comprising 13 papers (10 original articles and 3 reviews), addresses various aspects of the field of melanoma progression: genomic and proteomic approaches, experimental studies, the questions of sentinel lymph node dissection, and metastasis formation of uveal and conjunctival melanomas is also discussed [...].

Newly identified form of phenotypic plasticity of cancer: immunogenic mimicry.

Cancer plasticity is now a recognized new hallmark of cancer which is due to disturbances of cell differentiation programs. It is manifested not only in various forms like the best-known epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) but also in vasculogenic and megakaryocytic mimicries regulated by EMT-specific or less-specific transcription factors such as HIF1a or STAT1/2. Studies in the past decades provided ample data that cancer plasticity can be manifested also in the expression of a vast array of immune cell genes; best-known examples are PDL1/CD274, CD47, or IDO, and we termed it immunogenic mimicry (IGM). However, unlike other types of plasticities which are epigenetically regulated, expression of IGM genes are frequently due to gene amplifications. It is important that the majority of the IGM genes are regulated by interferons (IFNs) suggesting that their protein expressions are regulated by the immune microenvironment. Most of the IGM genes have been shown to be involved in immune escape of cancers broadening the repertoire of these mechanisms and offering novel targets for immunotherapeutics.

Clinical sequencing identifies potential actionable alterations in a high rate of urachal and primary bladder adenocarcinomas.

OBJECTIVE: Administration of targeted therapies provides a promising treatment strategy for urachal adenocarcinoma (UrC) or primary bladder adenocarcinoma (PBAC); however, the selection of appropriate drugs remains difficult. Here, we aimed to establish a routine compatible methodological pipeline for the identification of the most important therapeutic targets and potentially effective drugs for UrC and PBAC. METHODS: Next-generation sequencing, using a 161 cancer driver gene panel, was performed on 41 UrC and 13 PBAC samples. Clinically relevant alterations were filtered, and therapeutic interpretation was performed by in silico evaluation of drug-gene interactions. RESULTS: After data processing, 45/54 samples passed the quality control. Sequencing analysis revealed 191 pathogenic mutations in 68 genes. The most frequent gain-of-function mutations in UrC were found in KRAS (33%), and MYC (15%), while in PBAC KRAS (25%), MYC (25%), FLT3 (17%) and TERT (17%) were recurrently affected. The most frequently affected pathways were the cell cycle regulation, and the DNA damage control pathway. Actionable mutations with at least one available approved drug were identified in 31/33 (94%) UrC and 8/12 (67%) PBAC patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we developed a data-processing pipeline for the detection and therapeutic interpretation of genetic alterations in two rare cancers. Our analyses revealed actionable mutations in a high rate of cases, suggesting that this approach is a potentially feasible strategy for both UrC and PBAC treatments.

[Farnesyltransferase inhibitors have antitumoral effects in mutant KRAS containing cancer cells in preclinical models]. / Farnezil-transzferáz-inhibitorok (FTI) szinergista módon potencírozzák a mutáns KRAS inhibitorai daganatellenes hatásait preklinikai modellekben.

In silico studies raised the possibility that farnesyltransferase inhibitors (FTIs) may have antitumoral effects on KRAS mutant cancer cells. Accordingly, we have tested FTIs (tipifarnib and lonafarnib) in G12C mutant human cancer cell lines in vitro and in vivo. We have discovered that the combination of the two drugs has a synergistic antitumoral effect. Next, we have tested FTIs on G12D mutant human cancer cell lines and found that the combination has antitumoral effect in various preclinical cancer models. At last, we have also tested FTIs on G12V mutant human cancer cells and again we have detected antitumoral effects. We suggest that FTIs may have clinical relevance outside the HRAS mutant cancers.

KRASG12C mutant lung adenocarcinoma: unique biology, novel therapies and new challenges.

KRAS mutant lung cancer is the most prevalent molecular subclass of adenocarcinoma (LUAD), which is a heterogenous group depending on the mutation-type which affects not only the function of the oncogene but affects the biological behavior of the cancer as well. Furthermore, KRAS mutation affects radiation sensitivity but leads also to bevacizumab and bisphosphonate resistance as well. It was highly significant that allele specific irreversible inhibitors have been developed for the smoking associated G12C mutant KRAS (sotorasib and adagrasib). Based on trial data both sotorasib and adagrasib obtained conditional approval by FDA for the treatment of previously treated advanced LUAD. Similar to other target therapies, clinical administration of KRASG12C inhibitors (sotorasib and adagrasib) resulted in acquired resistance due to various genetic changes not only in KRAS but in other oncogenes as well. Recent clinical studies are aiming to increase the efficacy of G12C inhibitors by novel combination strategies.

On-Target Side Effects of Targeted Therapeutics of Cancer.

The concept of precision medicine is based on the identification of hallmarks of cancer to exploit them as drug targets. The basic idea was that in this way the therapeutic modalities will be more effective and the side effects will be less. Since the majority of these novel modalities are not specific for a cancer-related biological process or a cancer-specific (mutant) target protein, it is not a surprise that we had to learn new type of side effects, because these therapeutics also affect physiological or pathological processes. Even more, in cases of some of these novel therapies we were able to discover new molecular mechanisms of physiological and pathological processes. Identification of the on-target side effects of targeted drugs can help to prevent the development of them or better manage the patients when emerge during cancer therapy.

[Molecular pathology of skin melanoma]. / A bor melanómájának molekuláris patológiája: diagnosztikus, prognosztikus és prediktív markerek.

Skin melanoma became one of the most frequent malignancies of the skin mainly due to the increased exposure to environmental UV irradiation. However, this did not lead to the increase of mortality, mainly due to the efficient early diagnostics as well as to the development of new therapies which were based on the identification of the mutation patterns and understanding of the immunobiology. Molecular markers are important to differentiate malignant tumors from precancerous ones but also routinely available to define prognosis. Immunotherapy can be used in any molecular class of melanoma, while target therapy is only available in case of BRAF mutant form. Meanwhile these novel therapies induce new resistance mechanisms based on the development of acquired genetic alterations. Due to these facts the initial molecular profiling of the resected primary tumors must gradually be replaced by continuous monitoring.

Molecular Pathology of Skin Melanoma: Epidemiology, Differential Diagnostics, Prognosis and Therapy Prediction.

Similar to other malignancies, TCGA network efforts identified the detailed genomic picture of skin melanoma, laying down the basis of molecular classification. On the other hand, genome-wide association studies discovered the genetic background of the hereditary melanomas and the susceptibility genes. These genetic studies helped to fine-tune the differential diagnostics of malignant melanocytic lesions, using either FISH tests or the myPath gene expression signature. Although the original genomic studies on skin melanoma were mostly based on primary tumors, data started to accumulate on the genetic diversity of the progressing disease. The prognostication of skin melanoma is still based on staging but can be completed with gene expression analysis (DecisionDx). Meanwhile, this genetic knowledge base of skin melanoma did not turn to the expected wide array of target therapies, except the BRAF inhibitors. The major breakthrough of melanoma therapy was the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors, which showed outstanding efficacy in skin melanoma, probably due to their high immunogenicity. Unfortunately, beyond BRAF, KIT mutations and tumor mutation burden, no clinically validated predictive markers exist in melanoma, although several promising biomarkers have been described, such as the expression of immune-related genes or mutations in the IFN-signaling pathway. After the initial success of either target or immunotherapies, sooner or later, relapses occur in the majority of patients, due to various induced genetic alterations, the diagnosis of which could be developed to novel predictive genetic markers.

Identification of a Tumor Cell Associated Type I IFN Resistance Gene Expression Signature of Human Melanoma, the Components of Which Have a Predictive Potential for Immunotherapy.

We developed a human melanoma model using the HT168-M1 cell line to induce IFN-α2 resistance in vitro (HT168-M1res), which was proven to be maintained in vivo in SCID mice. Comparing the mRNA profile of in vitro cultured HT168-M1res cells to its sensitive counterpart, we found 79 differentially expressed genes (DEGs). We found that only a 13-gene core of the DEGs was stable in vitro and only a 4-gene core was stable in vivo. Using an in silico cohort of IFN-treated melanoma tissues, we validated a differentially expressed 9-gene core of the DEGs. Furthermore, using an in silico cohort of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-treated melanoma tissues, we tested the predictive power of the DEGs for the response rate. Analysis of the top four upregulated and top four downregulated genes of the DEGs identified WFDC1, EFNA3, DDX10, and PTBP1 as predictive genes, and analysis of the "stable" genes of DEGs for predictive potential of ICI response revealed another 13 genes, out of which CDCA4, SOX4, DEK, and HSPA1B were identified as IFN-regulated genes. Interestingly, the IFN treatment associated genes and the ICI-therapy predictive genes overlapped by three genes: WFDC1, BCAN, and MT2A, suggesting a connection between the two biological processes.

Organ Specific Copy Number Variations in Visceral Metastases of Human Melanoma.

Malignant melanoma is one of the most aggressive skin cancers with high potential of visceral dissemination. Since the information about melanoma genomics is mainly based on primary tumors and lymphatic or skin metastases, an autopsy-based visceral metastasis biobank was established. We used copy number variation arrays (N = 38 samples) to reveal organ specific alterations. Results were partly completed by proteomic analysis. A significant increase of high-copy number gains was found in an organ-specific manner, whereas copy number losses were predominant in brain metastases, including the loss of numerous DNA damage response genes. Amplification of many immune genes was also observed, several of them are novel in melanoma, suggesting that their ectopic expression is possibly underestimated. This "immunogenic mimicry" was exclusive for lung metastasis. We also provided evidence for the possible autocrine activation of c-MET, especially in brain and lung metastases. Furthermore, frequent loss of 9p21 locus in brain metastases may predict higher metastatic potential to this organ. Finally, a significant correlation was observed between BRAF gene copy number and mutant allele frequency, mainly in lung metastases. All of these events may influence therapy efficacy in an organ specific manner, which knowledge may help in alleviating difficulties caused by resistance.

[Molecular classification of bladder cancer in 2021]. / A húgyhólyagrák molekuláris klasszifikációja, 2021.

Bladder cancer belongs to the high mutation burden cancers due to the genetic alterations in non-conventional DNA repair systems such as ERCC2. Bladder cancer is characterized by mutations of FGFR3, HER-2 and HRAS and translocations of FGFR3 and PPARG. The papillary luminal form is the FGFR3 mutant, the unstable luminal version is the HER-2 mutant, while in the basal form EGFR amplification can be detected. Prognosis of bladder cancer is also defined by molecular features such as the claudin and MMP expressions and chromosomal alterations detected by UroVysion test. Last but not least, molecular aberrations are strong predictive factors: high mutation burden defines sensitivity toward immunotherapies, ERCC2 and HER-2 mutations define sensitivity toward chemotherapy, BRCA1/2 mutations define sensitivity to PARP inhibitors, tumors with FGFR3 mutation are prone to FGFR inhibitors while HRAS mutations define sensitivity to farnesyltransferase inhibitors.

[Molecular classification of pancreatic cancer]. / A hasnyálmirigyrák molekuláris klasszifikációja.

Pancreatic cancer is a malignancy with outstandingly poor prognosis caused by several factors among which one is that it is predominated by mutant KRAS oncogene. Genomic studies revealed that clinically useful therapy targets are present only in the DNA repair deficient subgroup and in the minor wild type KRAS-carrying group. However, phylogenetic studies defined four molecular subgroups of pancreatic cancer among which the immunogenic progenitor form could well be the target of immunotherapies. Furthermore, this group may well be the one characterized by DNA repair deficiency and high tumor mutational burden. Furthermore, the majority of familiar pancreatic cancers could also be found in this latter subgroup. Unfortunately, the G12C mutation of KRAS in pancreatic cancer is rare, therefore pancreatic cancer patients could not benefit from the recent revolution of KRAS target therapies.